We are of the opinion that there is also identity between erroneous thinking and existence. Our opinion is based on the following facts.

This paper considers the importance of unification in the context of developing scientific theories. I argue that unifying hypotheses are not valuable simply because they are supported by multiple lines of evidence. Instead, they can be valuable because they guide experimental research in different domains in such a way that the results from those experiments inform the scope of the theory being developed. I support this characterization by appealing to the early development of quantum theory. I then draw some comparisons (...) with discussions of robustness reasoning. (shrink)

This paper considers the importance of unification in the context of developing scientific theories. I argue that unifying hypotheses are not valuable simply because they are supported by multiple lines of evidence. Instead, they can be valuable because they guide experimental research in different domains in such a way that the results from those experiments inform the scope of the theory being developed. I support this characterization by appealing to the early development of quantum theory. I then draw some comparisons (...) with discussions of robustness reasoning. (shrink)

In this article, I consider some of the first appearances of a hypothesis of quantized energy between the years 1900 and 1913 and provide an analysis of the nature of the unificatory power of this hypothesis in a Bayesian framework. I argue that the best way to understand the unification here is in terms of informational relevance: on the assumption of the quantum hypothesis, phenomena that were previously thought to be unrelated turned out to yield information about one another on (...) the basis of agreeing measurements of the numerical value of Planck’s constant. (shrink)

With increasing inoculations and emerging coronavirus variants, governments worldwide are challenged to adopt proper liberty-restricting measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19 and minimise grave consequences for liberty and well-being caused by over a year-long pandemic. Cameron et al ’s proposal of a selective strategy addresses this pressing issue.1 Following Savulescu and Cameron, they argue for limiting the liberty of the elderly. But, instead of claiming not doing so is an instance of wrongful levelling down equality, they argue this discriminative (...) strategy is morally acceptable.2 I argue against the selective liberty-restrictive measures after proposing a revision of the five-limb proportionality test that plays a pivotal role in supporting their argument. The following is a reconstruction of Cameron et al ’s central argument: It is ethically acceptable to promote the best outcome. One way to promote the best outcome is to maximise utility at the population level without imposing unreasonable costs on the most vulnerable individuals. All else being equal, adopting selective liberty-restricting measures in the COVID-19 pandemic is the best way to maximise utility at the population level without imposing unreasonable costs on the most vulnerable individuals. If it is ethically acceptable to …. (shrink)

Though 2023 marks the sixtieth anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s iconic “I Have a Dream” speech, my reflections on the theme of the 2023 annual meeting of the Society of Christian Ethics, “Vision, Imagination, and Dreams in the Work of Ethics,” are inspired by King’s lesser known “Beyond Vietnam” speech. I connect my hopes for the future of Christian ethics to King’s still unrealized vision of social transformation. It is one where the US (and other empires) would affirm—not (...) subvert—each people’s right to self-determination and we scholar-activists would continue to search for connections between and among social issues even if others insist upon their discreteness. (shrink)

The purpose of this dissertation is to contribute to our understanding of scientific theory pursuit by providing a detailed case study on the development of early quantum theory, from roughly 1900 to 1916. I first elaborate on why this case should be considered an instance of piecemeal pursuit by presenting the historical quantum conjectures that were being used in different contexts. These conjectures gave varied interpretations of quantization. By comparing these conjectures, I identify a general quantum postulate that captures the (...) underlying assumption common to all the cases. I argue that it is possible to consider a general postulate about quantization even when its proper application is ambiguous in a given context, and that the postulate can be separated from different elements of the framework being used to investigate it. I show that the quantum postulate can be deemed promising by analysing the support it gains using a Bayesian framework. I first defend the use of such a framework by considering the purported inconsistencies in Planck's introduction of his quantum conjecture and how we should handle these. I then explicate two cases of support for the postulate. First, I show how we can use a particular solution to the Bayesian problem of old evidence to interpret the support the quantum postulate received by accounting for phenomena that had no previous explanation. Finally, I show that the quantum postulate is also supported by a unification argument, where unification is interpreted as informational relevance between the different domains of inquiry. (shrink)

In this article, I evaluate Hartmann and Fitelson’s solution to the Bayesian problem of old evidence by applying it to an early stage in the development of quantum theory. I argue that this case study suggests that whether old evidence is anomalous affects its support for a hypothesis. I introduce and defend two formal assumptions to accommodate this idea. This analysis not only explicates an important historical example, but it also shows that the given solution captures the intuitive importance of (...) “surprising” evidence that has previously been problematic in the context of old evidence. (shrink)

While not a monolithic movement, ecofeminists are united in their conviction that there are important connections between the exploitation of both women and nature. They are internally divided, however, on the propriety of applying their theoretical claims and activist strategies across social contexts. This paper explores three debates within ecofeminism that largely turn on this universalist versus particularist tension: whether ecofeminist theorizing can adequately account for cultural variation; whether its common usage of essentialist rhetoric is productive or troubling; and whether (...) resources for social activism could legitimately be culled from an assembly of heterogeneous and foreign sources. I conclude that the universalism of the women–nature connection can indeed be justified if perceived in multivalent ways, that “earthcare” or “ecomaternalist” discourse can be helpful in some contexts but harmful in others, and that selective retrieval of other cultures for the purposes of advocacy should not be ruled out as necessarily imperialistic or otherwise inappropriate. (shrink)

There exists a problem of the circularity in measurement: construction of theories requires reliable data, but obtaining reliable data requires reliable measurement devices whose construction requires a theory. I argue that adapting Anil Gupta's empiricist epistemology to a scientific context yields a possible solution. One can consider the role of data not as providing a foundation for a theory, but as acting functionally, licensing revisions of a previous theory. Data provide scientists with entitlement to their claims conditional on their background (...) theory. Unconditional entitlement is obtained when different starting theories converge to the same view over the course of experimentation. I explain this idea using two examples, one in thermometry and one involving experiments on the weak neutral current. (shrink)

There exists a problem of the circularity in measurement: construction of theories requires reliable data, but obtaining reliable data requires reliable measurement devices whose construction requires a theory. I argue that adapting Anil Gupta's empiricist epistemology to a scientific context yields a possible solution. One can consider the role of data not as providing a foundation for a theory, but as acting functionally, licensing revisions of a previous theory. Data provide scientists with entitlement to their claims conditional on their background (...) theory. Unconditional entitlement is obtained when different starting theories converge to the same view over the course of experimentation. I explain this idea using two examples, one in thermometry and one involving experiments on the weak neutral current. (shrink)

This essay examines several recent contributions to the growing literature on animal ethics from Christian perspectives. I categorize the four books under review in one of three ways depending on the scholars' methodological points of departure: a reconstruction of the place of other animals in Christian history through a selective retrieval of texts and practices; an identification of a key Christian ethical principle; and a reconsideration of foundational doctrines of systematic theology. On the premise that social ethicists are interested in (...) not only understanding the world, but also changing it, I observe that these authors have offered different answers to the following three questions: whether the theoretical basis for reform is ultimately grounded upon notions of human sameness or difference with other animals; whether scholar-activists should emphasize logic over passion or values over interests in their calls for transformation; and whether moral motivation for their targeted audiences is best served by reliance upon secular argumentation and interdisciplinary research or upon the distinctive claims of revelation and other tradition-specific norms. I conclude by offering my own thoughts about which approaches might prove more effective than others. (shrink)

BY EXPLORING THE ONGOING CONTROVERSY WHETHER TEACHER-LED recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools is constitutional, this paper demonstrates how and why Christians have much to gain from reverting the pledge to its pre-1954 text. I expose critical weaknesses in recent strategies to retain the contested words "under God" in the pledge employed by litigants, amici curiae, several Supreme Court justices, and other interested parties. I additionally interrogate the prominent place the American flag holds in public life and (...) question whether such preoccupation rises to the level of fetishism or even idolatry. Finally, I conclude that pacifists and others who are critical of America's expanding military empire have good reason to reject the Pledge of Allegiance entirely, whether or not the nation is described as being "under God.". (shrink)

Although increasing in usage, surrogacy remains the most controversial method of assisted reproductive technology. Many Christian ethicists have either objected tout court or expressed strong reservations about the practice. Behind much of this caution, however, lies essentialist assumptions about pregnant women or an overemphasis on the statistical minority of well-publicized disasters. The question remains whether Christian ethical reflection on surrogacy might change if informed by social scientific studies on the surrogacy triad. I offer a feminist Christian framework for surrogacy comprised (...) of seven principles drawn from this literature, the reproductive justice paradigm, human rights, and Reformed theo-ethical norms. I ultimately advance surrogacy under certain conditions as a moral good and focus on “altruistic” arrangements—including my own—without concluding that only non-commercial contracts could pass ethical muster. (shrink)

There has been much discussion arising from Reichenbach's distinction in the philosophy of science between the context of discovery and the context of justification. More recently, some have also begun to distinguish between these and the "context of pursuit" at which point scientists are pursuing a theory or hypothesis that has been suggested as plausible, but is not yet deemed acceptable. However, there has been relatively little work done on characterizing this process by using specific scientific examples. In this talk, (...) I consider Millikan's 1916 experiment on the photoelectric effect, and its relation to Einstein's light quanta hypothesis in order to clarify the role of hypotheses in the context of theory pursuit. I argue that Millikan's results did not directly support the light quanta hypothesis, but that they did constrain the possible theories that could be subsequently developed. Thus, a hypothesis can be useful for guiding research, but we must be careful to evaluate whether the experimental results genuinely support the hypothesis or not. (shrink)

U članku se pokušalo prikazati toleranciju kao krepost tj. sposobnost u smislu određenog habitusa koje čovjeku omogućuje stupiti u ispravan odnos s drugim čovjekom. Međutim, prije nego li se počelo s predstavljanjem kreposti tolerancije, prvo se objasnio pojam kreposti u aristotelovskom smislu i to pod posebnim vidom aristotelovske kreposti prijateljstva. To je razjašnjenje dovelo do zaključka da je krepost unutarnje stanje , a koje nekom čovjeku omogućuje svoje osjećaje i prirodne datosti dovesti u sklad i harmoniju. Zbog toga su kreposti (...) nekog čovjeka pretpostavke za njegovo ispravno djelovanje kako prema samom sebi tako i prema drugome. S tim u vezi tolerancija će biti prikazana kao krepost koja čovjeku pomaže nadilaziti poroke poput predrasude, neprijateljskog držanja i mržnje prema drugom čovjeku. Upravo ovi poroci ne predstavljaju samo opasnost za pojedinca kao takovog nego i za čitavo društvo jer indirektno ugrožavaju demokraciju i ljudska prava te ih mogu štoviše i blokirati. Nadilaženje, stoga, ovih poroka kroz kreposti dijaloga i tolerancije, omgućuje stvaranje temelja za demokraciju i ljudska prava uopće. Na kraju članka se obrađuje odnos između prava i morala – morala u smislu kreposti – te se dolazi do zaključka da se oni u društvu trebaju nadopunjavati, a ne međusobno isključitvati. (shrink)

Dewey, kućni prijatelj i politički istomišljenik njegova oca, inspirirao je Rortyja od malih nogu, ostajući uzor kojemu bi se na svakom spoznajnom raskrižju uvijek vraćao. Njegov pragmatizam poslužio mu je u odbacivanju filozofskih, društvenih i kulturnih dogmi, a njegov demokratizam poticao na oduševljenje američkim patriotizmom, koji je obojici važio za esencijalnu komponentu građanstva, što su im kritičari predbacivali kao crtu naiviteta. No i ta se »naivistička« Deweyjeva načela Rortyjevog zagovaranja slobode pravednije jednakosti, temelje na baštini njegove prosvjetiteljski katarzične socijalne etike, (...) kojom se je Rorty, s velikim povjerenjem u društveno dobro, izvlačio iz kreativnog nihilizma svog ironičnog »antiizma«.Dewey inspired Rorty in the first place as his father’s friend and political mate. Whenever the younger man was at some kind of a cognitive crossroads Dewey would act as his philosophical anchor. Dewey’s pragmatism and democratism helped him in casting off philosophical, social and cultural dogmas, at the same time encouraging him to turn towards the enthusiasm of America’s patriotism that was for both of them an essential component of citizenry. Their critics described this component and the principles of Dewey’s and Rorty’s social ethics as some kind of naïveté. Rorty followed the so-called naïveté of Dewey pleading for liberty as some kind of fundamental fairer equality. Rorty applied Dewey’s heritage of enlightened cathartic social ethics using it with great belief in public good, and as a means of saving himself from the creative nihilism of his own ironic “antiism”. (shrink)

Namjera je ovog rada pokazati neke elemente Miltonovih i Lockeovih političkih spisa, ovisno o njihovim odnosima prema različitim medijima. Milton u svojoj argumentaciji protiv cenzure mora pokazati da se sve drevne instance za cenzuru, često citirane u njegovom stoljeću, mogu interpretirati kao primjeri drugog fenomena. Međutim, Milton prepoznaje, analizirajući mjesta u Platonovoj Državi i nekim biblijskim temama, doseg i značaj nepojmovnih, netiskanih, neverbalnih oblika komunikacije; on ih opisuje kao znakove djetinjastog, ženskog ili neobrazovanog ponašanja, kao beznačajne fenomene iz perspektive političke (...) slobodne utjelovljene u slobodi tiska. Stav Johna Lockea je isti. Pokazat ću lanac ideja, sličan Miltonovom, u njegovim djelima Dvije rasprave o vladi i Pismo o toleranciji, fokusirajući analizu na pojam adijafore. (shrink)

The text questions the idea of transgenderism, or more specifically, the positioning of the androgynous paradigm that is ecological , as a possible Utopian projection into the future; as a radical NO to the present that still has not, regardless of whether we like it or not, fulfilled the possibility of legal and political status for all forms of life.Naturally enough, apart from an interpretation of the androgyne as the archetype of the unity of oppossing energies , I also take (...) into account Kari Weil’s interpretation of the androgyne,according to whose unmasking the androgyne also figures as the misogynous ideal, a construct of the patriarchal ideosphere. Or, as Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar have proposed – the alternative term gynandrous , since the very structure of the lexeme androgyny reflects the power of the male symbolic vision over the female view of the Universe.Considering the circumstances in Croatia, transgenderism is perceived in the text as an ignored state of affairs, since intersexuals are not categorised in the »Statute on the Structure and Method of Work of the Expert Opinion Component in Implementing Rights from Social Welfare and Other Rights According to Specific Regulations«, which simply means that they have no specific rights under the present social welfare system.By way of the identity of the androgyne as a third gender, which unifies the categories of masculinity and femininity, or, more specifically, by the ecological androgynous paradigm, I consider the attempt to delete the dichotomy of neglected Nature versus culture, as explicated, for example,by the feminist biologist Lynda Birke, and the attempt to achieve a bioethical encounter between the human animal and the ‘nonhuman’ animal, which I define conditionally with the term transspeciesism, which covers the ethical negation of speciesism.Namely, within the framework of eco/feminist theory, the socio-cultural anthropologist Barbara Noske was one of the first to put forward the question of the human relation towards other animals, demanding the establishment of an anthropology of animals, since – even now – only an anthropology of humans exists in relation to animals. (shrink)

Autor pita može li se intencionalnost opisati kao unutarnji ili kao izvanjski odnos. Nakon što je pokazao da je nemoguće reducirati intencionalnost na puke izvanjske odnose, on naglašuje da nije moguće niti pojmiti ju ekskluzivno kao unutarnji odnos. Nema intencionalnog unutarnjeg odnosa bez njegova konteksta izvanjskih odnosa koji mu dopuštaju da djeluje. Autor pokušava pokazati primjer za to analizirajući problem determiniranja intencionalnosti kao povezane s anticipativnom strukturom intencionalnosti, s posebnom pozornošću, s jedne strane, prema stvari ambigviteta, te s druge strane, (...) prema onoj nemogućnosti. On pokušava pokazati da sposobnost intencionalnosti da sebe determinira ovisi o uvjetima koji pripadaju okolnostima. Njegova demonstracija je na liniji s nekom vrstom eksternalizma u filozofiji uma.The author asks whether intentionality could be described as an internal or an external relation. Afterhe has shown that it is impossible to reduce intentionality to mere external relations,he emphasizes that it is not possible either to consider it to be an internal relation exclusively.There is no intentional internal relation without its context of external relations that permit it towork. The author tries to make a case for that by analyzing the problem of the determination of intentionalityas related to the anticipative structure of intentionality, with special attention on theone hand to the issue of ambiguities and on the other hand to the one of impossibilities. He tries toshow that the ability for the intentionality to self-determine depends on conditions which pertain tocircumstances. His demonstration is in line with some kind of externalism in the philosophy of mind. (shrink)

Potreba za pripovijedanjem ne samo da je stvorila epske poeme i brojne mitologije nego je, prema P. Ricoeuru, sama jezgra stvaranja znanja o sebi. Proces identifikacije kroz naraciju ne navodi nas na usredotočenost na našu vlastitu naraciju. Mi uvijek prvenstveno nailazimo na naracije drugih ljudi i tek onda počinjemo pričati našu životnu priču. Kroz proces imitacije, mimesisa, kako ga shvaća Ricoeur, mi istodobno možemo učiti kako etiku tako i moral. Globalni svijet sa svojim pojednostavljenim naracijama tržišta nastoji ostati pri prvoj (...) i drugoj mimezi te ne može pristupiti trećoj, tek u kojoj možemo početi govoriti o kreativnosti. Autor uspoređuje Ricoeurove filozofske nazore o identitetu s Frischovim literarnim eksperimentom u djelu I’m Not Stiller. Oba su primjer hermeneutičkog preplitanja koje dovodi do prirodnog identiteta. U ovom se hermeneutičkom procesu možemo ponovno pronaći u svijetu u kojem ćemo poštivati vlastiti identitet bivajući otvorenima za njegove kreativne transformacije. (shrink)

U članku se daje prikaz Schopenhauerovih razmišljanja o ljudskoj spolnosti i homoseksualnosti, te o ženama, koja je ovaj znameniti filozof iznio u svojim djelima Svijet kao volja i predodžba i Parerga i paralipomena. U prikaz je uključena i kritika Schopenhauerovih stavova, a postavlja se i načelno pitanje: može li se i u kojem smislu jedna filozofija smatrati »velikom« ukoliko su ne samo uz nju, nego i u njoj prisutni stavovi koji su obilježeni krajnjom proizvoljnošću i negativnim predrasudama?This paper presents Schopenhauer’s (...) views on human sexuality and women that were brought out in his works Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung and Parerga und Paralipomena. The article contains a critique of his attitudesand it attempts to answer a principal question: is it possible to consider a philosophy as being ‘major’ if it contains, and not only incidentally,attitudes of extreme arbitrariness and negative prejudices. (shrink)

In einem früheren Artikel wurde untersucht, wie Philosophen wie Ernst Cassirer, Ludwig Klages und Max Scheler mit dem Themenkomplex „Geist und Leben“ umgingen. In ei nem zweiten Teil geht es über die Frage der Geist-Leben-Beziehung hinaus um die Frage, wie sich Cassirer mit der Lebensphilosophie im Allgemeinen (und mit der Philosophie von Ludwig Klages insbesondere) beschäftigt und zwar nicht nur damals in seinem Scheler Aufsatz, sondern auch im dritten, gleich 1929 veröffentlichten Band der Philosophie der symbolischen Formen sowie in den (...) Nachlassmanuskripten zum geplanten vierten Band. Aus dieser Untersuchung geht hervor, dass man Cassirer durchaus als Klages-Kenner ein stufen kann, und (a) auf dessen Klages-Kritik, (b) auf eine mögliche klagesianische Antwort darauf und schließlich (c) auf die wichtigen, in der Forschungsliteratur oft übersehenen Affinitäten zwischen Cassirer und Klages – vor allem hinsichtlich solcher Themen wie des Symbols, des Spieles und der Rolle des Ästhetischen – wird hier systematisch eingegangen. (shrink)

Najnovije rasprave o civilnom društvu razmatrale su procese globalizacije čime je proširen teorijski diskurs kako bi se obuhvatio pojam globalnoga civilnog društva. Pojam i praksa civilnog društva globalizirali su se na način koji odražava empirijske procese međupovezivanja društava i oblikovanja svjetskog društva. Iz normativno mobilizirajuće perspektive, aktivisti i teoretičari civilnoga društva ističu potrebu za obranom svjetskog društva od globalne prijetnje nuklearnim ratom, ekoloških katastrofa, zločina i nasilja, dominacije svjetskih sila nad sudbinom pojedinih zemalja i društava, tj. potrebu da se ono (...) suprotstavi tendenciji »politike moći« na svjetskoj razini i da obrani autonomiju društva kao onoga koje je primarno uskladivo s ekspanzijom politika koje su zasnovane na vladavini zakona diljem svijeta, a neuskladivo s politikom sile, državnih razloga i dominacijom svjetskih središta moći. Procesi globalizacije rezultiraju sukobljavanjem i/ili asimilativnim prelaženjem civilizacija i kultura, kao i kontroverznim tendencijama: s jedne strane, pokušaja uvođenja međunarodnih političkih institucija i usvajanja međunarodnih konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava, za zaštitu demokratskih vrijednosti, za borbu protiv terorizma i segregacije prema različitim osnovama, vodeći time prema globalnoj standardizaciji kulture ljudskih prava i demokratskog političkog i pravnog poretka, a s druge strane, rastom ksenofobije, partikularizacije i etnonacionalizma, građanskih ratova, ekoloških prijetnji, globalnog terorizma, prijetnjom problema gladi, nuklearnog rata, novim bolestima itd. Suvremena pobjeda liberalnih i demokratskih vrijednosti pozitivni je doseg, no praćen osporavanim pitanjem suvereniteta, propadanjem urbanog, rasizmom, etničkim čišćenjem, ksenofobijom, neuspjelim političkim legitimacijama , a na globalnoj razini praćen je: globalnom nepravdom, siromaštvom, ekološkim opasnostima, masovnim i smrtonosnim bolestima, ugnjetavanjem manjinskih skupina, nezaustavljivim rastom stanovništva, velikim nesrazmjerima političke i ekonomske moći, terorizmom na globalnoj razini, prijetnjom nuklearnom katastrofom itd. Globalno civilno društvo ima tri dimenzije: 1.) empirijski fenomen globaliziranih društvenih relacija, međupovezanosti, 2.) mobiliziranje, formativnu silu projekta/vizije i 3.) društvene čimbenike na globalnoj/transnacionalnoj razini. Antiglobalizacijski pokret je pokušaj djelovanja nasuprot uočenim negativnim aspektima tekućih procesa globalizacije. Iako pristaše tog pokreta često djeluju uigrano, sam je pokret heterogen i obuhvaća raznolika, povremeno suprotstavljena, shvaćanja tog procesa, alternativna viđenja, strategije i taktike. Prema tome, iznijansirani pojmovi obuhvaćaju antikapitalističku/ antikorporativnu alternativnu globalizaciju. Njegovi sudionici mogu koristiti pozitivne izraze poput ‘globalna pravda’ ili ‘pokret za poštenu trgovinu’; ili ‘pokret za Globalnu Pravednost i Solidarnost’; ili ‘Pokret svih Pokreta’; ili jednostavno ‘Pokret’; ili ‘antikorporativni kapitalistički pokret’. Općenito govoreći, antiglobalizacijski pokret kao takav nije u velikoj mjeri suprotnost globalizaciji nego je oporba određenom načinu na koji se ona odvija – kao što je to neoliberalni proces globalizacije. U tom smislu, mnogi predstavnici Pokreta više vole da ih se naziva altermondijalizmom. (shrink)

Tekst govori o Milbankovom poimanju kulture kao donologije. Namjera je autora da se tematizira hermeneutička dispozicija i metafizička vizija projekta poznatijeg pod nazivom ‘Radikalna ortodoksija’ unutar kojeg John Milbank ima ulogu neformalnog voditelja. Nakon kratkog odgovora na pitanje što je ‘Radikalna ortodoksija’ dolazimo do njihove kritike modernizma, pogotovo onog dijela koji se odnosi na kulturu. Nakon toga predstavljamo Milbankovo promišljanje o postmodernoj kulturi i njegovu kritiku kulture kao donologije. Pored Deleuze i Gauttarija najvažniji autor za Milbanka jest Augustin kojeg on (...) iščitava i tumači pomoću participativno doksološkog diskursa u kontekstu postmoderne teorije.This text is about Milbank’s concept of culture as donology. Intention of author is present hermeneutical disposition and metaphysical vision of project very well known as Radical Orthodoxy. John Milbank is informal leader of the project. After short explanation what is Radical Orthodoxy all about, we came to their critique of modernity, especially this part of critique which is concerned with a culture. After that critique we will shortly introduce Milbank’s insights on postmodern culture and his critique of culture as donology. Most important authors for Milbank are not only Deleuze and Gauttary but also in first place Augustine Aurelius. Milbank reads and interprets Augustine with the help of participative doxolological discourse in context of postmodern theory. (shrink)